Commercial Brick

Pattern Act 77

The defendants Anthony Pezzullo, Anthony Frantellizzi, Dominick Frantellizzi and
Commercial Brick Inc., committed the crime of COMBINATION iN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
AND COMPETITION, in violation of General Business Law Sections 340 and 341, as follows:

Said defendants, on or about October 14, 1997 in Queens County and elsewhere, acting
with others known and unknown to the Grand Juiy, knowingly and intentionally engaged in a
contract, agreement, arrangement and combination in unreasonable restraint of trade and
competition, to wit, to restrain competition in the construction industry throughout the City and
State of New York by means of price fixing, bid rigging and other anticompetitive arrangements
relating to a masonry subcontract at the New York City School Construction Authority project
at IS 93 Queens.

Pattern Act 78

The defendants Anthony Pezzullo, Anthony Frantellizzi, Dominick Frantellizzi and
Commercial Brick Inc., committed the crime of COMBINATION iN RESTRAiNT OF TRADE
AND COMPETITION, in violation of General Business Law Sections 340 and 341, as follows:

Said defendants, on or about July 29, 1998, in New York County and elsewhere, acting
with others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly and intentionally engaged in a
contract, agreement, arrangement and combination in unreasonable restraint of trade and
competition, to wit, to restrain competition in the construction industry throughout the City and
State of New York by means of price fixing, bid rigging and other anticoinpetitive arrangements
relating to a construction project known to the Grand Jury as Project 2.

Pattern Act 79

The defendants Anthony Pezzullo, Arthur Zambardi, Andrew Reynolds, Joseph
Tangorra, Philip DeSimone, Steven L. Crea, Joseph Datello, Giuseppe Palmeri, Anthony

45