Illinois Police And Sheriff’s News © 1999 All rights
reserved. Not for republication on the internet.
|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT |
||
|
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and Plaintiffs, V. CONSTRUCTION & GENERAL LABORERS' Defendant. |
)
|
MAGISTRATE
JUDGE GUZMAN 99 Ct RECEIVED MICHAEL
W.DUBBINS |
COMPLAINT
INDEX
|
|
PAGE |
|
|
I |
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|
¶¶ 1-5 |
|
|
II. |
JURISDICTION |
4 |
|
|
¶ 6 |
|
|
III |
VENUE |
4 |
|
|
¶¶ 7-8 |
|
|
IV. |
LA COSA NOSTRA |
4 |
|
|
Introduction |
5 |
|
|
a. The LCN Commission |
5 |
|
|
b. LCN Families |
6 |
|
|
c. Judicial Authority for the |
6 |
|
V. |
THE PARTIES |
|
|
|
The Plaintiffs. |
7 |
|
|
Defendant Chicago Laborers |
8 |
|
|
a. Composition of Membership |
9 |
|
|
b. Purpose and Operation of a |
9 |
|
|
c. Potential for Abuse |
10 |
|
|
d. Composition of the CLDC |
10 |
|
|
e. Officers of the CLDC |
11 |
|
|
f . Operations of the CLDC |
11 |
|
|
g. Funds Affiliated with |
12 |
|
VI. |
THE TRUSTEESHIP ACTION |
13 |
|
|
Introduction. |
13 |
|
|
LIUNA's Internal Reform Program |
13 |
|
|
a. Democratic
Practices |
14 |
|
|
b. Financial Practices |
14 |
|
|
c. Health, Welfare and |
14 |
|
|
d. Business and Financial |
15 |
|
|
e. Barred Conduct |
15 |
|
|
The Trusteeship Complaint |
16 |
|
|
CLDC Officers and the Outfit |
18 |
|
|
The Trusteeship Hearing |
20 |
|
|
The Trusteeship Decision |
21 |
|
|
Implementation of the Trusteeship |
24 |
|
|
Actions of the Trustee |
24 |
|
|
Other Reform
Actions |
|
|
VII. |
CO-CONSPIRATORS
NOT NAMED AS DEFENDANTS |
27 |
|
VIII. |
CORRUPTION
OF THE CHICAGO LABORERS |
|
|
IX. |
THE
DOMINATION AND CONTROL OF THE |
54 |
|
|
a. Selection of officers
to |
55 |
|
|
(1) Outfit Selection of
International |
55 |
|
|
(2) Selection of Chicago
District |
59 |
|
|
b. Cronyism and Nepotism
in the CLDC |
63 |
|
|
c. Appointment and
Retention of Corrupt |
69 |
|
|
d. Lack of Democratic
Practices |
72 |
|
X. |
FIRST
CLAIM FOR RELIEF: CONSPIRACY |
82 |
|
|
Conspiracy to Acquire
and Maintain Control of CLDC |
83 |
|
|
The |
|
|
|
Manner and Means |
|
|
|
Overt Acts |
|
|
XI. |
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF: CONSPIRACY |
92 |
|
|
Conspiracy to Conduct
the Affairs of the |
92 |
|
|
The Chicago District
Council/La Cosa |
93 |
|
|
Manner and Means |
95 |
|
|
Overt Acts |
96 |
|
XII. |
THE FAILURE OF LIUNA OFFICIALS TO SATISFY |
|
|
|
Legal and Ethical
Obligations of CLDC Officials |
|
|
|
Notice of Corruption
within LIUNA |
104 |
|
XIII. |
PRESENT STATUS Of THE CHICAGO
LABORERS |
105 |
|
XIV |
DEMAND FOR RELIEF |
106 |
|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT |
|
|
) |
|
|
LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL |
) |
|
|
OF |
) |
|
|
ROBERT LUSKIN, in his official |
) |
|
|
capacity as General Executive |
) |
|
|
Board Attorney, |
) |
|
|
Plaintiffs, |
) |
|
|
V. |
) |
No. |
|
CONSTRUCTION & GENERAL LABORERS' |
) |
|
|
DISTRICT COUNCIL OF |
) |
|
|
VICINITY, an affiliated entity of |
) |
|
|
the Laborers' International |
) |
|
|
of |
) |
|
|
Defendant. |
|
|
COMPLAINT
The United States of America, by
and through Scott R. Lassar, United States Attorney for the Northern District
of Illinois, and the Laborers' International Union of North America (hereafter
"LIUNA"), by and through Robert Luskin in his official capacity as
General Executive Board Attorney of LIUNA (hereafter "GEB Attorney"),
for their complaint, allege as follows:
I
INTRODUCTION
1 . This action is brought against the Construction & General Laborers' District Council of Chicago and vicinity (hereafter "Chicago Laborers District Council," or the "CLDC") to rid the district council of domination and influence by members and associates of organized crime. The CLDC is a group of 21 local unions affiliated with LIUNA. The Chicago Laborers District Council has been infiltrated by corrupt individuals and organized crime figures who have exploited their control and influence over the district council for personal gain and to the detriment of the CLDC.
2. As a result of the strong, pervasive ties to organized crime, officers and employees of the CLDC and its constituent locals and affiliated funds have been chosen and controlled by various members and associates of organized crime. Consequently, the rights of the members of the union to control the affairs of the union have been systematically abused. Those union members who might have opposed this corrupt state of affairs have been intimidated into silence by economic coercion and by the well-known ties between corrupt union officials and organized crime.
3. In 1995, LIUNA, acting through its General Executive Board (hereafter "GEB") , which has authority and control over all of the executive and judicial powers of the union, entered into an oversight agreement with the United States Department of Justice, As part of that agreement, LIUNA has adopted an Ethical Practices Code ("EPC") designed to root out corruption from LIUNA and its affiliated entities and an Ethics and Disciplinary Procedure, which created an independent structure consisting of the GEB Attorney and the LIUNA Inspector General to investigate and prosecute potential violations of the EPC and an Independent Hearing and an Appellate officers to adjudicate these charges. In February 1998, the
2
Chicago Laborers District Council was placed into trusteeship by
LIUNA as a result of that internal reform program.
4 The United States and LIUNA, by and through Robert Luskin
its GEB Attorney, bring this suit so the United States can obtain equitable
relief and for injunctive relief pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations statute, Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1961
through 1968, (hereafter "RICO") , to support and advance the actions
taken pursuant to the internal reform program in order to put an end to
systemic and long-standing corruption and the involvement of organized crime in
the affairs of the CLDC and to restore control of its affairs to the delegates
and officers of the CLDC and the rank and file members
of its constituent local unions.
5 . The
3
II
JURISDICTION
6 .
Jurisdiction in this action is predicated upon Title 18 United States Code,
Section 1964(b); and Title 28,
III
VENUE
7. Venue for this action is predicated upon Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1965(a) ; and Title 28, United States Code, Section 13 91 (b) .
8. The
IV
LA COSA NOSTRA
9. Introduction: La
Cosa Nostra (hereafter referred to alternatively as "the LCN,"
"the mafia," "the mob," or the "outfit"), which
name is based on a phrase which translates into English from the Italian
language as "this thing of ours" or "our thing," is a
nationwide criminal organization which operates in various cities throughout
the United States. The LCN is composed of groups of men of Italian descent who
are organized into units which are referred to as a "family," or, in
the Italian language, "il borgata." A person becomes a member of an LCN
family through
4
a ceremony which is conducted in a manner designed to keep it, and the existence of the family, secret from persons who are not members of the LCN. Each family of La Cosa Nostra is headed by a boss" who is assisted by an "Underboss" and a "consigliere," or counselor. The family conducts its criminal activities through entities known as "crews." A crew is headed and supervised by a person referred to variously as a "street boss," a "Crew boss," a "caporegima," a "capodecina," a "capo" or some other such name. Each crew consists of formally inducted members of the family who are commonly referred to as "soldiers" or "made members" and persons who are not members, but who knowingly participate and cooperate in the activities of the family, who are referred to as "associates." Persons who have been formally inducted into membership in an LCN family are often referred to as having been "made," "straightened out," or as being a "made member."
a. The LCN Commission: The affairs of the LCN are governed
by a "commission" (hereafter "the Commission") which is
composed of the bosses of the most significant families. The boss of the LCN
family in
5
frustrate law enforcement scrutiny, the Commission meets infrequently.
b. LCN Families:
Each family of La Cosa Nostra is identified by the name of its boss, the name
of a former boss, or by the city in which it is located. The
C. Judicial
Authority for the Existence of the LCN: The existence of the LCN has been proved in a number of cases including, among others: United States v. _Infelise, et al. 90 CR
87, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, affirmed
in United States v. DiDomenico, 78 F. 3d 294 (7th Cir.) , cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 507
(1996) ; United States v. Carlisi, 92 CR 1064 in the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
affirmed in United States v. Zizzo, 120 F.3d 1338 (7th Cir. 1997) ; United
States v. Salerno, et al., No. SSS85 Cr. 139 (RO) , in the
6
the Southern District of New York, affirmed in
868 F. 2d 524, 534-538 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 811 (1989)
(hereafter "Salerno I" or "the Commission case") ; United
States v. Salerno, et al., No. 86 Cr. 245, in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York (hereafter "Salerno III' or the
"Genovese family case") ; United States v. Angiulo, et al., No.
Cr. 83-235, in the United States District Court for the District of
Massachusetts, affirmed in United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169 (1st
Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990); United States v. Scarfo, et
al., No. 88-00003-1-19, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, affirmed in United States v. Pungitore, 910
F. 2d 1084, 1148-1149 (3d Cir. 1990) , cert. denied, 500 U.S. 915 (1991).
V
THE PARTIES
10. The Plaintiffs:
a. The
b. Plaintiff LIUNA is a "labor organization", as that term is defined in Title 29, United States Code, Section 402(I),
7
that is, a labor organization engaged in an industry affecting
commerce which exists for the purpose of dealing with employers concerning
grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours and other terms and
conditions of employment. Robert Luskin is the General Executive Board Attorney
for LIUNA. As part of the Ethics and Disciplinary Procedure adopted by LIUNA in
January 1995, all of the investigative and disciplinary powers described in the
LIUNA Constitution, the Uniform District council Constitution and the Uniform
Local Union Constitution were delegated to Robert Luskin, as the GEB Attorney,
for the purpose of fulfilling the mandate of the GEB and the General
President to rid LIUNA of all corrupting influences. Pursuant to Title 18,
United States Code, Section 1964 (c) , LIUNA, as an entity "injured in its
business or property by reason of a [RICO] violation" has authority to sue
and "recover threefold the damages it sustains and the cost of the suit, including
a reasonable attorney's fee."
11. Defendant Chicago
Laborers District Council: The defendant Chicago Laborers District Council
consists of and oversees the operation of 21 constituent local unions
(hereafter, the "Locals") in the
8
"labor
organization," as
that term is defined in Title 29, United States Code, Section 402 (1) , that
is, a labor organization engaged in an industry affecting commerce which exists
for the purpose of dealing with employers
concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours and other
terms and conditions of employment - The Chicago Laborers District Council is
also an employee organization representing employees engaged in commerce and in
an industry and activity affecting commerce within the meaning of Title I of
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ( ( ( "ERISA" ).
a. Composition of
Membership: LIUNA represents a variety of general laborers, including
masons' helpers, general construction laborers, municipal workers,
highway construction laborers, pipeline laborers, excavators, watchmen,
asbestos removers, pavers, and stone cutters.
b. Purpose and Operation of a District Council: Under LIUNA's Uniform District Council
Constitution, the members of the Chicago Laborers District Council consist of
delegates from the locals affiliated with the district council. Under Article
XIX of the International union Constitution, I affiliated
local unions may be combined into an area district council. District councils
may be created either at the discretion of LIUNA's General Executive Board or
the General President and General Secretary-Treasurer or upon application by a
group of local unions. They are formed in order to combine economic power,
effort and
9
strength into a unit which would tend to enhance, promote and conserve
the welfare and interest of themselves and their members. " Article I,
Section 1 of the Uniform District Council Constitution. District councils have
broad powers to negotiate collective bargaining agreements with employers and
to determine and levy a per capita tax, initiation fee, readmission fee, or
other lawful fee or assessment on its affiliated Locals to defray council
expenses. In effect, the district councils supervise all of the activities of
their constituent local unions.
c. Potential for Abuse: While
district councils can serve a worthwhile purpose, they can also be used by
corrupt elements as tools of control in that domination of the district council
entails control of the constituent locals. The rank and file members of the union
do not directly participate in the actions of the district council. The members
of the district councils are the elected delegates from the constituent local
unions. Uniform District Council Constitution Article IV, Section 1.
d. Composition of the CLDC:
The Chicago Laborers District Council is headquartered at
10
1092. Each Local has
jurisdiction over a particular geographical area within Cook,
e. Officers of the CLDC: Pursuant
to Article V, Section 1(a) of the Uniform District Council Constitution, the
officers of the CLDC consist of the President, vice President, Secretary-Treasurer,
Business Manager, Sergeant at-Arms and three auditors. The CLDC is governed by
an Executive Board that consists of the CLDC President, Vice President,
Secretary -Treasurer, Business Manager, and three additional delegates from the
Locals.