UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

)

 

Plaintiff

)

 

V.

)

NO

LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF
NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO

)
)

DRAFT

 

)

JOSEPH AIUPPA

)

 

ARTHUR J. BERNE,

)

 

LOUIS CASCIANO,

)

 

JAMES B. CASTALDO,

)

 

JOHN CATANZARO,

)

Complaint

RAYMOND FLYNN,

)

 

JAMES F. GALLO,

)

 

JOHN GIARDIELLO,

)

 

MICHAEL LABARBARA, JR.,

)

 

GENNARO LANGELLLA,

)

 

ANTHONY D. LIBERATORE ,

)

 

CHESTER J. LIBERATORE,

)

 

LOUIS ANTHONY MANNA, also known as
"Bobby Manna,"

)
)

 

JAMES MESSERA,

)

 

ROCCO J. NAPOLI,

)

 

CARMINE PERSICO,

)

 

ALFRED PILOTTO,

)

 

JOHN RIGGI,

)

 

JOSEPH P. ROSATO,

)

 

DANIEL G. SANSANESE, JR.

)

 

JOSEPH A. TODARO, SR.,

)

 

JOSEPH A. TODARO, JR.,

)

 

SALVATORE TRICARIO,

)

 

MATTHEW MICHAEL TRUPIANO, JR.,

)

 

PETER VARIO, also known as "Jocko,"

)

 

PETER A. VARIO, also known as "Butch"

)

 

 

)

 

THE GENERAL EXECUTIVE BOARD OF
THE LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL
UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO,

)
)
)

 

 

)

 

ARTHUR ARMAND COIA,

)

 

General President,

)

 

ROLLIN P. "BUD" VINALL,

)

 

General Secretary-Treasurer,

)

 

MASON M. "MAX" WARREN,

)

 

First Vice-President,

)

 

JOHN SERPICO,

)

 

Second Vice-President,

)

 

VERE O. HAYNES

)

 

Third Vice-President,

)

 

SAMUEL J. CAIVANO

)

 

Fourth Vice-President,

)

 

ENRICO MANCINELLI,

)

 

Fifth Vice-President,

)

 

CHUCK BARNES,

)

 

Sixth Vice-President,

)

 

JACK WILKINSON,

)

 

Seventh Vice-President

)

 

GEORGE R. GUDGER

)

 

Eighth Vice-President,

)

 

MICHAEL QUEVEDO, JR.

)

 

Ninth Vice-President,

)

 

ARMAND E. SABITONI

)

 

Tenth Vice-President,

)

 

ROBERT J. CONNERTON,

)

 

General Counsel

)

 

 

 

 

 


INDEX

Page

  1. INTRODUCTION

1

¶.¶. 1-3

2

  1. JURISDICTION

 

¶ .4

 

  1. VENUE .

2

¶¶  5-6 .

 

IV. LA COSA NOSTRA ...

3

Introduction .....

3

¶..... 7

 

Judicial Authority for the Existence
of the LCN .....

4

¶..... 8

 

The LCN Commission .....

4

¶..... 9

 

LCN Families .....

5

¶.....10

 

V . THE PARTIES.

8

The Plaintiff..

8

¶.....11

 

The Union Defendant...

8

¶.....12

 

Individual Defendants....¶..

12

ii

 

Defendant LIUNA International Officials.

32

¶.....14

 

VI. CO-CONSPIRATORS NOT NAMED AS DEFENDANTS...

37

 

 

¶..... 15

 

VII. THE ENTERPRISE...

47

¶..... 16

 

VIII. COUNT ONE,VIOLATION OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1962 (b)

48

Acquiring and Maintaining Control of LIUNA .....

48

¶..... 17

 

The Enterprise

49

¶..... 18

 

Methods and Means.....

49

¶..... 19

 

    1. Selection of Officers to Control LIUNA.....

49

¶..... 19 a

 

(1) Selection of the General President....

49

¶ 19 a.(l)

 

(2) Selection of Regional, District
Council and Local Officials

51

¶.....19 a.(2)

 

 

 

b. Acts of Violence to Control LIUNA.....

59

¶..... 19 b

 

Page iii

 

c. Appointment and Retention of
Corrupt LIUNA Officials to Control LIUNA.....

61

¶..... 19 c

 

d. Use of Election and Other Internal Procedures to Control LIUNA

70

¶..... 19 d

 

(1) Constitutionally Prescribed Procedures

71

¶ .....19 d.(l)

 

(a) Office of The General President...
¶ .....19 d.(l)(a..

71

(b) Method of Nominating Candidates for International Officer Positions ....
. ¶ .....19 d.(l)(b)

71

(c) Filling of Vacancies on the General Executive Board¶..... 19 d.(1)(c)

72

(2) Control of Elections
¶ .....19 d.(2)

74

(3) Manipulation of the Hiring Hall Used to Gain Employment for Rank and File Members of LIUNA ....
¶ .....19 d.(3. )

76

(4) Use of Trusteeships to Prevent Opposition to Entrenched Leadership Within LIUNA
¶ .....19 d.(4)

79

Page iv

 

(a) Local 853 .....
¶ .....19 d.(4) (a)
(b) Local 13 .....
¶ .....19 d.(4) (b)
(c) Local 66
¶ .....19 d.(4) (c)
(d) Local 46
¶ .....19 d.(4)(d)
(e) Local 7
¶ .....19 d.(4)(e)

79

80
.
82

83

84

(5) Formation of District Councils to Prevent Opposition to Entrenched Leadership Within LIUNA
¶.... 19 d.(5)

85

e. Cronyism and Nepotism in LIUNA
¶ .....19 e.

87

IX. COUNT TWO, CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1962 (b)

96

Conspiracy to Acquire and Maintain Control of LIUNA.....
¶.....20

96

The Enterprise and Manner and Means
¶¶ .....21-22

97

X. COUNT THREE, VIOLATION OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1962(c)
¶¶...... 21-22

97

Conducting the Affairs of the Enterprise Through a Pattern of Racketeering Activity........
¶ .....23

98

Page v

 

The Enterprise and Manner and Means
¶ .....24

99

XI. COUNT FOUR,CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE, TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1962 (c)

99

Conspiracy to Conduct the Affairs of the Enterprise Through a Pattern of Racketeering Activity
¶ .....25

99

The Enterprise and Manner and Means
¶ .....26-27

100

XII. THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY

100

A. Racketeering Act Related to the Extortion of the LIUNA Membership,
Racketeering Act No. 1

¶ .....28

 

B. Racketeering Acts Related to Corruption of the Chicago Laborers' District Council, the Southeast Florida Laborers' District Council, the Massachusetts Laborers District Council and the Rhode Island Laborers' District Council,
Racketeering Acts Nos. 2 through 10

¶ .....29-38

103

C. Racketeering Act Related to the Control of LIUNA Local Unions in St. Louis, Missouri,
Racketeering Act No. 11 .....

¶ .....39

113

D. Racketeering Acts Related to Colombo Family Control of the Cement and Concrete workers District Councils New York City
Racketeering Acts Nos. 12 through 19 .
....
¶ ¶ .....40-42

114

vi

 

E. Racketeering Acts Involving the LCN Commission's Use of the LIUNA Cement and Concrete Workers District Council to Corruptly Extort and Control Cement Work in New York City,
Racketeering Acts Nos. 20 Through 37

¶ ¶.....43-45

118

F. Racketeering Acts Related to Corruption of LIUNA Local Union 21 by the Genovese Family in Northern New Jersey,
Racketeering Acts Nos. 38 through 60

¶¶..... 46-49

123

G. Racketeering Acts Related to De Cavalcante LCN Family Control of LIUNA Local Unions in Northern New Jersey,
Racketeering Acts Nos. 54 through 63 .....

¶¶..... 50-53

126

H. Racketeering Acts Related to Luchese Family Control of LIUNA Local Union No.66, Long Island, New York
Racketeering Acts Nos. 64 through 91
.....
¶ ¶.....54-63

130

I. Racketeering-Acts Related to the Corruption and Control of LIUNA Local 210, by the Buffalo LCN Family,
Racketeering Acts Nos. 92 through 97B

¶¶ .....64-67

136

J. Racketeering Acts Involving the Corruption and Control of the Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York,
Racketeering Acts Nos. 98 through 103

¶¶…..68-72

141

K. Racketeering Acts Related to Control of LIUNA Locals 310 and 860, Cleveland, Ohio,
Racketeering Acts Nos. 104 through 109

¶¶ 73--76

146

vii

 

L. Racketeering Act Relating to Control of Training Funds of Upstate New York LIUNA Locals
Racketeering Acts No. 110A-11OL .
.
¶ ¶ .....77-79.

150

XIII. SUMMARY OF THE RACKETEERING ACTS CHARGED AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT .....
¶ .....80

166

XIV. THE FAILURE OF LIUNA OFFICIALS TO SATISFY THEIR ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS

168

Ethical Obligations of LIUNA Officials
¶ .....81

169

.Ethical Obligations Imposed by Liuna Constitutions
¶..... 81 a

169

Ethical Standards of the American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations
¶ .....81 b.

171

Ethical Obligations Imposed by Law
¶ .....81c.

171

Widespread Publicity of Corruption Within LIUNA ¶..... 82

172

The Report of the President's Commission on Organized Crime
¶ .....82 a

173

The Interim Report of the New York State Organized Crime Task Force on Corruption and Racketeering in the New York City Construction Industry
¶ .....82 b

177

viii

 

The Mother Jones Article
¶ .....82 c.

180

Specific Instances of Failure to take Adequate Action to Eliminate Corruption ¶ .....83

182

XV. THE AURA OF CRIMINALITY EXISTING WITHIN LIUNA

187

Other Convictions of LIUNA Officials
¶ .....84

187

a. New York-New Jersey

187

b. Illinois-Indiana

192

c. Missouri-Arkansas

195

d. Connecticut

197

e. Florida

197

f. Ohio

198

g. Nevada/California

199

h. Louisiana

200

XVI. CURRENT STATUS OF LIUNA
¶ .....85-88

202

XVII. DEMAND FOR RELIEF

204

ix

 


DRAFT

COMPLAINT

The United States of America, plaintiff herein, by and through, James B. Burns, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, for its complaint herein, alleges as follows:

I

INTRODUCTION

1 This action is brought against the Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO (hereafter alternatively, "LIUNA," or "the union,") and others to rid the union of domination and influence by members and associates of organized crime. LIUNA has been infiltrated at all levels by corrupt individuals and organized crime figures who have exploited their control and influence over the union for personal gain and to the detriment of the union.

2. LIUNA union officers and employees at all levels, including the general presidency, have been chosen, subject to the approval of, and have been controlled by, various members and associates of organized crime. Four consecutive General Presidents of LIUNA, Joseph V. Moreschi (1926-1968), Peter Fosco (1968-1975), Angelo Fosco (1975-1993) and ARTHUR ARMAND COIA (1993-present), have associated with, and been controlled and influenced by, organized crime figures. Consequently, the rights of the members of the union to control the affairs of the union have been systematically abused. Those union members who opposed this corrupt state of affairs, either at the local, district council, regional or

1

international levels, have been intimidated into silence by violence, threats or violence, economic coercion, and by the known ties of corrupt local, district , regional, and international officials of the union with organized crime.

3. The United States brings this suit for injunctive relief pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statute (hereafter "RICO"), Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1961 through 1968, to put an end to this systemic, long-standing, and ongoing corruption of the union and to restore control of its affairs to the members of the union.


II
JURISDICTION

4. Jurisdiction in this action is predicated upon Title 18, United Stares Code, Section 1964(b) and Title 28, United States Code, Sections 1331, 1345, and 2201.


III
VENUE

5. Venue for this action is predicated upon Title 18, United States Code, Section 1965 and Title 28, United States Code, Section 1391(b)).

6. The United States invokes the expanded service of process provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1965(b).

2


IV
LA COSA NOSTRA

7. Introduction: La Cosa Nostra (hereafter referred to alternatively as the LCN," the mafia," or "the mob"), which name is based on a phrase which translates into English from the Italian language as "this thing of ours" or our thing," is a nationwide criminal organization which operates in various cities throughout the United States. The LCN is composed of groups of men of Italian descent who are organized into units which are referred to as a "family", or, in the Italian language, "il borgata." A person becomes a member of an LCN family through a ceremony which is conducted in a manner designed to keep it, and the existence of the family, secret from persons who are not members of the LCN. Each family of La Cosa Nostra is headed by a "boss" who is assisted by an "underboss" and a "consigliere", or counselor. The family conducts its criminal activities through entities known as "crews " headed and supervised by a person referred to variously as a" street boss," a "crew boss", a "caporegima", a "capodecima, a " capo " or some other such name. (Such persons are hereafter referred to collectively as soldiers " or individually as a "capo"). Each crew consists of formally inducted members of the family who are commonly referred to as "soldiers" or "made members " and persons who are not members, but who knowingly participate and cooperate in the activities of the family, who are referred to as "associates." Persons who have been formally inducted into

3

membership in an LCN family are often referred to as having been "made", "straightened out, " or as being a " made member. "

8. Judicial Authority for the Existence of the LCN: The existence of the LCN has been proved in a number of cases including, among others: United States v. Salerno, et. al., No.SSS85 Cr. 139 (RO), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, affirmed in 868 F. 2d 524, 534-:38 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 811 (1989) (hereafter "Salerno I" or " the Commission cases"); United States v. Salerno. et al., No. 86 Cr. 245 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (hereafter Salerno II" or the "Genovese family case " ); United States v. Infelise. et. al. , No. 90 Cr. 87 , in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, (appeal pending); United States v. Angiulo,. et al., No.Cr. 83-235 , in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, affirmed in United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169 (1st Cir.) , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 845 (1990); United States v. Scarfo. et al., No. 88-00003-1-19 , in the United States District Court: for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, affirmed in United States w. Pungitore, 9l0 F. 2d 1084, 1143-l149 (3d Cir. 1990) , cert. denied, 500 U.S.915 (1991).

9. The LCN Commission : The affairs of the LCN are governed by a "commission" (hereafter "the Commission") which is composed of the bosses of the most significant families. The bosses of four of the five families in the New York City area - the Colombo, Gambino, Genovese, and Luchese families - have been members of the

4

Commission since its creation. At various times bosses, or representatives, from the LCN families in Chicago, Illinois, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Cleveland, Ohio; Buffalo, New York; and Detroit, Michigan, have been members of the Commission. The Commission serves as the national ruling council of the LCN families. Among other matters, the Commission has regulated, facilitated and controlled relationships and settled disputes between and among the LCN families. The Commission also has approved the admission of new members to the various LCN families and the selection of the bosses of the families. To frustrate enforcement scrutiny, the Commission meets infrequently.

10. LCN Families : Each family of La Cosa Nostra is identified by the name of its boss, the name of a former boss, or by the city in which it is located. The families of the LCN include, among others, the following:

a. The BONNANO family which is headquartered in New York City and operates in various other locations in the United States. The Bonnano family is the one New York City LCN family whose boss is not a member of the Commission;

b. The BUFALINO family which is headquartered in the area of Pittston, Pennsylvania and operates in Northeastern Pennsylvania and New York State;

c. The BUFFALO family which is headquartered in the area of Buffalo, New York and operates there and in various other locations;

5

d. The CHICAGO family which is headquartered and operates in the area of Chicago, Illinois, in the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois, in other areas of Illinois, and in various locations in Florida and the western part of the Unites States. The Chicago family is commonly referred to as "the outfit." The boss of the Chicago family is a member of the Commission. Often the views of the Chicago family are presented to the Commission by the Genovese family, which is identified in subparagraph j. below;

e. The CLEVELAND family which is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio and operates there. The Cleveland family is represented on the Commission by the Genovese family, which is identified in subparagraph j. below;

f. The COLOMBO family which is headquartered in New York City and operates there and in various other locations. The boss of the Colombo family is a member of the Commission;

g. The DECAVALCANTE family which is headquartered in northern New Jersey and operates there and in various other locations. The boss of the DeCavalcante family answers to the boss of the Genovese family;

h. The DETROIT family which is headquartered in Detroit Michigan and operates there and in various other locations. The Detroit family is represented on the Commission by the Genovese family;

6

i. The GAMBINO family which is headquartered in New York and in various other locations. The boss of the Gambino family is a member of the Commission;

j. The GENOVESE family which is headquartered in New York City and operates there and in various other locations. The boss of the Genovese family is a member of the Commission;

k. The KANSAS CITY family which is headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri and operates there and in various other locations. The Kansas City family is represented on the Commission by the Chicago family;

1. The LOS ANGELES family which is headquartered and operates in Los Angeles California. The Los Angeles family is represented on the Commission by the Chicago Family;

m. The LUCHESE family which is headquartered and operates in New York City and various other locations. The boss of the Luchese Family is a member of the Commission;

n. The MILWAUKEE family which is headquartered and operates in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The Milwaukee family is represented on the Commission by the Chicago Family;

o. The NEW ENGLAND or PATRIARCA family which is headquartered in the areas of both Boston, Massachusetts and Providence, Rhode Island and operates there and in various other locations. The New England family is represented on the Commission by the Genovese family;

7

p. The NEW ORLEANS family which is headquartered and operates in New Orleans, Louisiana. The New Orleans family has close relationships with both the Chicago and Genovese families;

q. The PHILADELPHIA or BRUNO/SCARFO family which is headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Atlantic City, New Jersey. The Philadelphia family is represented on the Commission by the Genovese family and is sometimes referred to by the last names of former bosses, Angelo Bruno and Nicodemo Scarfo;

r. The PITTSBURGH family which is headquartered and operates in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The Pittsburgh family is represented on the Commission by the Genovese family;

s. The ST. LOUIS family which is headquartered and operates in area of St. Louis, Missouri. The ST. Louis family operates under the supervision of the Chicago family; and

t. The TRAFFICANTE family which is headquartered and operates in the area of Tampa, Florida. The Trafficante family is represented on the Commission by the Chicago family.


V

THE PARTIES

11. The Plaintiff: The United States of America, plaintiff herein, is a sovereign and body politic.

12. The Union Defendant: The defendant, LIUNA, composed of its regional offices and subordinate district councils and local unions, is a "labor organization," as that term is defined in Title 29, United States Code, Section 402(i), that is, a labor organization, engaged in an industry affecting commerce which exists

8

for the purpose of dealing with employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours and other terms and conditions of employment.

a. The union represents a variety of general laborers, including masons helpers, general construction laborers, highway construction laborers, pipeline laborers, watchmen, asbestos removers, pavers, stone cutters and mailhandlers.


b. The union was initially chartered by the American Federation of Labor in Washington, D.C. on April 13, 1903, and was formerly known as the International Hod Carriers Building and Common Laborers' Union of America.


c. The union has its international headquarters at 905 16th Street N.W., Washington D.C. and has local unions, District councils, and regional offices in the Northern District of Illinois and elsewhere throughout the United States and Canada. LIUNA has approximately 700,000 rank and file members.


d. The union includes eleven regional offices covering the United States The manager of a regional office of the union is the representative of the union in his geographic area and controls the regional office and the affairs of the union within that area. The union has approximately 60 district councils and approximately 820 local unions throughout the United States and Canada with approximately 5,000 local and district officers.


e. There is a separate division of LIUNA called the "National Post Office Mailhandlers Union" which primarily

9

represents mailhandlers and other employees of the United States Postal Service.

f. Under the Constitution of LIUNA (hereafter "Constitution"), the highest authority of LIUNA is the General Convention of the Laborers' International Union (hereafter "the General Convention") (Article I) which, as mandated by the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (hereafter "LMRDA"), Title 29, United States Code, Section 481(a), meets every five years in September or October in order to elect officers. (Article V, Section 1). The most recent meeting of the General Convention occurred in Las Vegas, Nevada, in October 1991; The delegates to the General Convention consist of the members of the General Executive Board and other delegates who, as mandates by LMRDA, are elected by local unions and district councils in good standing in the union. Article V, Sections 2-10). The General Convention elects all of the international officers of the union by plurality vote. If there is no opposition to a nominee for office, that nominee is considered duly elected. (Article VII, Section 4).

g. Under Articles I and VII1 of the Constitution, the defendant General Executive Board of the union (hereafter "the Board") is the body which directs the union between meetings of the General Convention. The Board is made up of all of the international officers of the union, that is, the General President, the General Secretary-Treasurer, and ten Vice Presidents. The Board has authority over all of the executive, legislative, and judicial powers of the union. The Board is named

10

as a defendant: herein for the purpose of properly effectuating the relief requested in th