John J. Flood   Bio & Jim McGough (Biography)
6304 N Francisco Av
Chicago. Il 60659
773-878-1002(tel)
 

 

 

LIUNA Independent Hearing Officer-
Peter Vaira, Esq.

LIUNA GEB Attorney,
Robert Luskin, Esq.

Gentlemen:

In the event, John Matassa is found guilty of the charges now under consideration
by the IHO either before or after the election, there will be a need for a new election as opposed to
allowing the executive board to appoint a new president should my efforts to get the members to vote
in favor of a supervisorship fail next tuesday. If we succeed, the supervisor can appoint one
or call for new elections (whatever the GEB Attorney thinks best) should the need arise.

Supplementing my election protest of May 1, 1999 wherein I ask that IG agents obtain
immediately a copy of Vince DiVarco's handwritten notes of the nomination and call for new nominations for all offices for the reasons stated, I have been informed the following constitutional and/or Ethical provisions were not adhered to in order to assure a free, fair, and honest election:

  1. The three judges of election are intimately   associated with Mike Christopher. Two are relatives, the third is dependent on Christopher for a political job.
  2. The salaries were not mentioned to the members nor was compensation discussed.
  3. The members were not informed a combination of office had been rejected by the International.
  4. The members do not know Matassa is being charged with violations of the EDP. Members
    do not read the "Coia rag". Others do not receive the International's propaganda because
    the local does not maintain current addresses of members.
  5. The chairman, Matassa, did not mention the requirement candidates must appear before the
    election judges.
  6. The judges did not mention the time and place for examination much less that there would be an examination, nor have they made any attempt to contact all candidates.
  7. Members were not encouraged to protest the qualification of candidates, i.e. to exercise their
    moral/ethical duty to report corruption.
  8. There was no contest for business manager, the position organized crime doesn't want to lose.
    Reschedule another nomination meeting without the coercive presence of known organized crime members and with the presence of personnel reformers can trust and there will be candidates to oppose the incumbent slate of candidates.
  9. The judges of election have not obtained competitive bids for the supplying of
    voting machines. No attempt has been made to-date to obtain voting machines.
    We don't trust voting machines provided by cronies of organized crime or
    from companies in which Connerton has a financial interest. We intend to have a mail in ballot
    and will vote accordingly, with ballots counted by the Corporation Trust Company or a reputable accounting/law firm without mob connections or business. We want the  ballot boxes under constant video surveillance if required. a motion to this effect will be offered.
  10. The executive board did not mention the election of delegates to other bodies, conferences,
    to which the local membership can elect delegates-AFL-CIO COPE. etc
  11. We will offer a motion that all members of the executive board be notified by e-mail
    and pager of any meetings of the executive board. DiMaggio was not told about the executive
    board meeting held prior to the nomination meeting even though he is an incumbent vice president 
  12. Union meetings in January and February were cancelled by Matassa even though a quorum was present. Matassa told the 20 members that 21 members were required for a quorum. Debate on issues affecting the local was purposely avoided as well as the news that in all probability the local would be put into supervisorship.or trusteeship  
  13. Matassa's letter of May 3,1999 to the members informing them that the nomination of delegates was not handled properly and will be rescheduled for the next  union meeting, while in conformity with the seven  day notice requirement, proposes unconstitutional procedures. LUUC Art VII, section 1 clearly provides that "A special meeting, to be known as the "Nomination Meeting, shall be held.... A special meeting is required and will be voted on by the membership as to time and place.

    Every decision of the executive board the members don't like will be voted on by the members. The members will take back control of their union from organized crime.

Laborers for JUSTICE© 1999 Web published as a service to LIUNA local 2 members by members of Laborers for JUSTICE.  Web published  to raise money to help pay for LMRDA lawsuits against corrupt union officials and to publish more information to assist LIUNA members in the effective exercise of their right of self governance. Not for republication on other web sites without the express written permission of Laborers for JUSTICE. Unauthorized publication on other web sites will sabotage our reform efforts, constitute copyright infringement, harm our fund raising efforts, and demonstrate the publisher to be a thief and unethical person unworthy of being called a "real laborer".

01/22/05

Laborers for JUSTICE
2615 W Peterson Av
Chicago Il 60659
773-878-1002(tel)
773-409-1503(fax)
Become a member of Laborers for JUSTICE and receive copies of the Arthur Coia disciplinary hearings

Send donations to help the cause and assist our efforts to make available via the internet to LIUNA members all information in LIUNA's docket.

 

IPSN  © 1997-2006 All Rights reserved. Not for republication on the internet without permission. 
webmaster