LIUNA Independent Hearing Officer-
Peter Vaira, Esq.
LIUNA GEB Attorney,
Robert Luskin, Esq.
In the event, John Matassa is found guilty of the charges now under consideration
by the IHO either before or after the election, there will be a need for a new
election as opposed to
allowing the executive board to appoint a new president should my efforts to get the
members to vote
in favor of a supervisorship fail next tuesday. If we succeed, the
supervisor can appoint one
or call for new elections (whatever the GEB Attorney thinks best) should the need arise.
Supplementing my election protest of May 1, 1999 wherein I ask that IG agents obtain
immediately a copy of Vince DiVarco's handwritten notes of the nomination and call for new
nominations for all offices for the reasons stated, I have been informed the following
constitutional and/or Ethical provisions were not adhered to in order to assure a free, fair, and honest election:
- The three judges of election are intimately associated with Mike Christopher. Two
are relatives, the third is dependent on Christopher for a political job.
- The salaries were not mentioned to the members nor was compensation discussed.
- The members were not informed a combination of office had been rejected by the
International.
- The members do not know Matassa is being charged with violations of the EDP. Members
do not read the "Coia rag". Others do not receive the International's propaganda
because
the local does not maintain current addresses of members.
- The chairman, Matassa, did not mention the requirement candidates must appear
before the
election judges.
- The judges did not mention the time and place for examination much less that there would
be an examination, nor have they made any attempt to contact all candidates.
- Members were not encouraged to protest the qualification of candidates,
i.e. to exercise
their
moral/ethical duty to report corruption.
- There was no contest for business manager, the position organized crime doesn't want to
lose.
Reschedule another nomination meeting without the coercive presence of known organized
crime members and with the presence of personnel reformers can trust and there will be candidates to
oppose the incumbent slate of candidates.
- The judges of election have not obtained competitive bids for the supplying of
voting machines. No attempt has been made to-date to obtain voting machines.
We don't trust voting machines provided by cronies of organized crime or
from companies in which Connerton has a financial interest. We intend to have a mail
in ballot
and will vote accordingly, with ballots counted by the Corporation Trust Company or a
reputable accounting/law firm without mob connections or business. We want the ballot boxes
under constant video surveillance if required. a motion to this effect will be offered.
- The executive board did not mention the election of delegates to other bodies,
conferences,
to which the local membership can elect delegates-AFL-CIO COPE. etc
- We will offer a motion that all members of the executive board be notified by e-mail
and pager of any meetings of the executive board. DiMaggio was not told about the
executive
board meeting held prior to the nomination meeting even though he is an incumbent vice
president
- Union meetings in January and February were cancelled by Matassa even though a quorum
was present. Matassa told the 20 members that 21 members were required for a quorum. Debate on issues
affecting the local was purposely avoided as well as the news that in all
probability the local would be put into supervisorship.or trusteeship
- Matassa's letter of May 3,1999 to the members
informing them that the nomination of delegates was not handled properly and will be rescheduled for the next union meeting, while in conformity
with the seven day notice requirement, proposes unconstitutional procedures. LUUC Art VII, section 1 clearly provides that
"A special meeting, to be known as the "Nomination Meeting, shall be held.... A special
meeting is required and will be voted on by the
membership as to time and place.
Every decision of the executive board the members don't like will be voted on by the
members. The members will take back control of their union from organized crime.
Laborers for JUSTICE© 1999 Web published as a service to LIUNA local 2 members by
members of Laborers for JUSTICE. Web published to raise money to help pay for
LMRDA lawsuits against corrupt union officials and to publish more information to assist
LIUNA members in the effective exercise of their right of self governance. Not for
republication on other web sites without the express written permission of Laborers for
JUSTICE. Unauthorized publication on other web sites will sabotage our reform efforts,
constitute copyright infringement, harm our fund raising efforts, and demonstrate the
publisher to be a thief and unethical person unworthy of being called a "real
laborer".
|